PRESS RELEASE 
    Utah 
    Medical Products, Inc. 
    Reports Financial Performance for 
    Second Quarter 
    2004 
    July 
    20, 
    2004 
    Contact: Paul Richins  
    (801) 566-1200  
    Salt Lake City, 
    Utah - In the second calendar quarter of 2004 (2Q 2004), Utah Medical 
    Products, Inc. (Nasdaq:UTMD) concluded its twenty-sixth consecutive quarter 
    of higher earnings per share (eps) compared to the same quarter in the prior 
    year.  
     
    Eps from normal operations for the most recent four calendar quarters (LTM) 
    were $1.51. Including “extraordinary” income from 4Q 2003 and 1Q 2004, LTM 
    eps were $4.93. The extraordinary income results from receipt of Tyco 
    International damages and interest of $30,944,000 relating to patent 
    infringement. 
     
    UTMD’s 2Q 2004 sales were about the same as 2Q 2003, a recovery from 1Q 2004 
    when sales were down 4% compared to 1Q 2003. Combining the two quarters, 1H 
    2004 sales were down 2%. The 2Q sales trend improvement came from better 
    international sales, improved CMI OEM molding sales and a mid-quarter 
    acquisition of Abcorp Medical, UTMD's vendor for external fetal monitoring 
    belts. 
     
    Comparing 2Q 2004 sales to 2Q 2003 sales in product categories, blood 
    pressure monitoring/ components sales were up 3%, neonatal product sales 
    were up 1%, obstetrics product sales were even, and gynecology/ 
    electrosurgery product sales were down 6%. 2Q 2004 international sales were 
    up 5% and domestic sales were down 2% compared to 2Q 2003. Even though 
    overall international sales were up, shipments by UTMD Ltd. (Ireland) were 
    down 4% in US Dollar terms, and 9% in EURO terms. International gynecology 
    product sales continued to be weaker than expected due to the Food & Drug 
    Administration’s (FDA’s) refusal to provide UTMD with Certificates to 
    Foreign Government (CFGs). According to CEO Kevin Cornwell, “We are keenly 
    disappointed by the FDA’s unilateral withholding of CFGs since early 2003. 
    This has been done without due process. The Denver District Director through 
    whom our application was refused, previously expressed ‘It’s out of my 
    hands,’ yet no one at the FDA is willing to discuss what they believe may be 
    the justification for this refusal. This conduct simply makes no sense 
    relative to the Bush administration’s stated economic goals of creating jobs 
    in America and seeking a level playing field with respect to foreign 
    commerce. I remind investors that UTMD’s devices always have been and remain 
    available to domestic and foreign users without restriction. UTMD has 
    retained outside regulatory and quality experts who support that UTMD has 
    been and remains in compliance with the FDA Quality System Regulation (QSR). 
    The reliable performance of our products and our reputation for safety and 
    quality among medical practitioners clearly suggest that our quality system 
    is serving its intended purpose. Recently other reputable and concerned 
    medical device industry participants have expressed support for our position 
    and wider industry relief.”  
     
    To put this in perspective, the Company has undergone five (5) FDA 
    inspections in three (3) years. If UTMD were not in compliance with the QSR 
    for the last three years, its devices could not have been used thousands of 
    times per day in high risk situations without any significant complication 
    over that time span. There’s been no FDA allegation that UTMD’s products are 
    unsafe. UTMD’s last inspection, which was five weeks long by three FDA 
    inspectors, was concluded 4½ months ago, and UTMD’s detailed written 
    response to the inspectors’ observations was submitted 4 months ago. An 
    independent expert and respected former FDA compliance official who 
    participated in the comprehensive inspection characterized the observations 
    resulting from the inspection as “shallow.” To date the FDA has not 
    responded with any feedback despite the Company’s request for a dialogue 
    that would exhaustively address any remaining issues.  
     
    According to Mr. Cornwell, “Earlier in October 2003, UTMD turned down a 
    Consent Decree offer which it considered unjustified. There has been no 
    further action by the government. The unreasonably long 2004 inspection, 
    particularly given UTMD’s small size, obviously did not support further 
    regulatory action. Now, as in the past, the FDA refuses to talk with us and 
    explain their position. After receiving no FDA response whatsoever, a 
    request in May from UTMD for non-binding mediation was rejected by the FDA. 
    If the FDA cannot justify formal enforcement action under due process of 
    law, they should advise the Company so that the CFGs can be issued without 
    delay. UTMD believes that this abuse of process should not be tolerated 
    because it damages the public health by reducing continued prospects for 
    innovation by, and survival of, smaller companies which simply expect that 
    FDA employees discharge their obligation to communicate promptly with 
    fairness and honesty.” 
     
    Because UTMD’s improved sales were in lower than average margin products, 
    gross profit margins declined somewhat compared to recent periods. The 
    slightly lower operating profit margin remained excellent on an absolute 
    basis. In 2Q 2004, UTMD achieved a gross profit margin of 57.6%, operating 
    profit margin of 38.5% and net profit margin of 27.0%. Profit margins for 2Q 
    2003 were 59.0%, 39.6% and 26.9%, respectively. UTMD’s earnings before 
    interest and income tax expenses and before non-cash depreciation/ 
    amortization expenses (EBITDA), were $3,007,000 in 2Q 2004 (44.0% of sales), 
    compared to $3,062,000 in 2Q 2003 (44.8% of sales).  
     
    The Company was able to achieve a higher net profit margin despite lower 
    gross and operating profit margins primarily because of income associated 
    with its larger than normal cash balances. Non-operating income in 2Q 2004 
    was $178,300 compared $85,000 in 2Q 2003, and excluding Tyco damages, was 
    $332,000 in 1H 2004 compared to $165,400 in 1H 2003. In 2Q 2003 and 1H 2003, 
    UTMD paid $15,800 and $42,200 respectively in interest because of a line of 
    credit balance which no longer existed in 1H 2004. In contrast, UTMD 
    received $68,000 in 2Q 2004 interest, dividend income and capital gains from 
    investing its cash balances, and $115,800 in 1H 2004. Compared to a year 
    earlier, June 30 cash and investment balances were $22,044,000 versus 
    $300,000. Inventories were down about $500,000, and net accounts receivable 
    and other current assets were each up about $100,000. Intangible assets 
    increased from investment in goodwill resulting from the Abcorp acquisition 
    and some new product technology that is still under development. Current 
    liabilities were about $3 million higher due to a higher reserve for 
    litigation expenses and accrual for higher income taxes. Despite reduction 
    in Shareholders’ Equity resulting from share repurchases, UTMD’s 
    Shareholders’ Equity is up about $21 million from one year ago. UTMD’s 
    current cash balances will be used in four ways: 1) expanding the Company’s 
    business through accretive acquisitions, 2) increasing product development 
    activity, 3) continuing UTMD’s share repurchase program, and 4) paying 
    dividends to shareholders. 
     
    Financial ratios which may be of interest to shareholders follow: 
    1) Current Ratio = 6.2 
    2) Days in Receivables (based on 2Q sales activity) = 46.6 
    3) Average Inventory Turns (based on 2Q CGS) = 3.3 
    4) Year-to-Date ROE (excluding extraordinary income and equity) = 31% 
     
    UTMD’s dilution from unexercised option shares added to actual weighted 
    average outstanding shares for purposes of calculating eps was 302,000 in 2Q 
    2004 compared to 366,000 in 2Q 2003, and 315,000 in 1H 2004 compared to 
    370,000 in 1H 2003. The actual number of outstanding shares at the end of 2Q 
    2004 was 4,522,500 which included 1H 2004 employee option exercises of 
    104,800 shares and share repurchases of 124,800. The average price paid by 
    the Company to repurchase shares in the open market during 1H 2004 was 
    $24.49 including commissions. Management continues to be mindful of the 
    dilution effect of its option programs. The total number of outstanding 
    unexercised options at June 30, 2004 was about 760,000 shares at an average 
    exercise price of $13.19/ share, including shares awarded but not vested. 
    This compares to 1.0 million option shares outstanding at the end of 1H 
    2003. 
     
    Investors are cautioned that this press release contains forward looking 
    statements and that actual events may differ from those projected. Risk 
    factors that could cause results to differ materially from those projected 
    include market acceptance of products, timing of regulatory approval of new 
    products, UTMD’s ability to efficiently manufacture, market, and sell its 
    products, among other factors that have been outlined in UTMD’s public 
    disclosure filings with the SEC. The 2Q 2004 10-Q will be filed with the SEC 
    by August 9.  
     
    Utah Medical Products, Inc., with particular interest in health care for 
    women and their babies, develops, manufactures, assembles and markets a 
    broad range of disposable and reusable specialty medical devices designed 
    for better health outcomes for patients and their care-providers. For more 
    information about Utah Medical Products, Inc., visit UTMD’s website at
    www.utahmed.com. 
     
    For purposes of comparison with the prior year, UTMD has separated the 
    additional “extraordinary” income and associated expenses from augmented 
    damages and interest received from Tyco in 1Q 2004 from its “normal” first 
    half (1H) 2004 operating results (“regular” column in the results table). 
      
     |