UTAH MEDICAL PRODUCTS,
    INC. 
      | 
  
PRESS RELEASE   
    UTMD Further Comments on FDA Complaint and FDA Comments Contact: Kevin
    L. Cornwell  Salt Lake City, Utah - Utah Medical Products, 
    Inc. (Nasdaq: UTMD) is a defendant in a complaint 
    filed by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) on August 9, 2004 
    with the U.S. District Court in Salt Lake City, alleging violations of the 
    Quality System Regulation (QSR). Compliance with the requirements of this 
    regulation “are intended to ensure that finished devices will be safe and 
    effective…” Q. I'm going to assume that your answers are a complete and exhaustive statement of the Agency's position unless you specifically state otherwise. Do you understand that? A. Yes. **** Q. You knew as of August 11, 2004, that the FDA is not aware of any harm linked to Utah Medical devices, correct? A. That's correct. Q. I would like to show you what's been marked as Exhibit 13. Exhibit 13 is a newspaper article in the Salt Lake Tribune on August 11, 2004. I'd like to direct you to the second page of Exhibit 13. The third paragraph down refers to your name and it says, "Spears conceded the FDA is making no allegations the company's products are unsafe or that any imminent public health risk exists." Is that an accurate of your -- accurate reflection of your statement to the Salt Lake Tribune on August 11, 2004? A. Yes. Q. So it is, in fact, true in this case that the FDA does not allege that Utah Medical has manufactured or distributed any unsafe product, correct? A. That's correct. Q. And it's also true in this case the FDA has not alleged that anyone has been injured by any product manufactured or distributed by Utah Medical, correct? A. That's correct. Q. And the FDA does not allege that Utah Medical has manufactured or distributed any defective product, correct? A. That's correct. Q. And the FDA does not allege that Utah Medical has manufactured or distributed any ineffective product, correct? A. That's correct. Q. And the FDA has authority to immediately seize products where the public health is threatened but it has not done that here, correct? A. That's correct. Q. And the FDA has authority to require recalls of devices if the public health is threatened but that has not been done here, correct? A. That's correct. Q. And the agency could have sought preliminary injunctive relief if there were a public health threat, but that was not done in this case either; is that correct? A. That's correct. According to UTMD CEO Kevin Cornwell, “Larry 
    Spears’ testimony confirms the very essence of UTMD’s compliance with the 
    QSR, namely, manufacture and distribution of safe and effective devices year 
    after year, year after year.”   |